The Double-Edged Sword of Scarcity and FOMO in Social Media Marketing
Scarcity and Fear of Missing Out (FOMO) are more than just marketing lingo; they are powerful psychological drivers that compel consumers to act quickly, often without overthinking. By capitalizing on these principles, brands can encourage swift purchase decisions, creating a sense of urgency and exclusivity. While these tactics can effectively drive engagement and sales, they must be carefully balanced to avoid eroding customer trust or harming a brand’s reputation.
The Scarcity Principle, as outlined by Cialdini (2006), suggests that limited availability increases desirability, which encourages consumers to make quicker purchasing decisions, sometimes without extensive deliberation. Yet, marketers must balance these tactics to maintain trust and reputation, as overuse can lead to consumer backlash. By examining the nuances of scarcity and FOMO, we can understand how to use them responsibly on social media as well as understand why a balanced approach is essential for brand longevity.
Understanding FOMO through the Scarcity Principle
Top-Down vs. Bottom-Up Thinking: How Scarcity Shifts Consumer Mindset
To understand the Scarcity Principle and Fear of Missing Out (FOMO), we first need to understand what drives consumer decision-making. We do this by understanding psychology’s theory of decision-making, that is: top-down and bottom-up thinking.
Top-down thinking is a rational, goal-oriented approach (Rousay, 2018). Consumers who use top-down thinking will start with an overall objective or belief and use that to filter information in a way that aligns with their goals or prior knowledge (Goldstein, 2014). For example, a shopper with a set budget may scan through multiple options but will eliminate anything that doesn’t fit their price range or desired features, making decisions based on a pre-set goal.
Bottom-up thinking, in contrast, is less goal-oriented but more detail-oriented (Rousay, 2023). This way of thinking isn’t focused on a specific goal but on small details at the moment (Goldstein, 2014). People using this approach pay attention to what’s directly in front of them and make choices based on the immediate situation. They often respond to sensory cues or emotional reactions rather than long-term plans or goals, allowing the surroundings to influence their decisions. For example, a shopper who walks through a grocery store without a list or specific plan might not intend to buy anything in particular but the bright colors and sweet smell of strawberries might catch their attention. So they decide to buy a pack. Their decision wasn’t driven by a pre-set goal, but by sensory details in the moment. The immediate experience—the look, smell, and display—guided their choice.
Top-down thinking is goal-oriented and deliberate, while bottom-up thinking is detail-focused and reactive, often triggered by scarcity cues that create urgency.
How Scarcity Activates Bottom-Up Thinking
The scarcity principle tends to shift consumers from top-down to bottom-up thinking (Barton, 2022). When faced with limited-time offers or low-stock alerts, consumers often become absorbed in the immediacy of the situation. Scarcity cues (e.g., “only two left in stock” or a countdown timer) emphasise specific details that push the consumer to react quickly, often without fully engaging in the more reflective, goal-oriented process typical of top-down thinking.
This bottom-up approach under scarcity conditions leverages urgency and emotional responses, prompting a sense of "now-or-never" action that encourages immediate decisions. As consumers focus on the immediate need to secure a rare or exclusive item, the broader considerations they might typically use in decision-making (such as comparing prices or features) often fade into the background. Instead, they’re drawn into the details of scarcity—creating a heightened desire to obtain what feels elusive or fleeting.
Scarcity shifts consumers from reflective to reactive decision-making.
The Scarcity Principle and the Fear of Missing Out
The scarcity principle also closely intervenes with the Fear of Missing Out. Fear of Missing Out, or FOMO, taps into the drive to avoid missing rewarding experiences. Popularized by McGinnis in 2004 and researched further by Przybylski et al. (2013), FOMO arises when people see others enjoying experiences they lack. Scarcity can create FOMO by signaling exclusivity and limited availability, making consumers feel they might miss out on something valuable if they don’t act immediately. For instance, when brands offer “only a few items left” or “limited-time access” on social media, they leverage scarcity to intensify FOMO. This approach not only prompts immediate purchases but also fosters an emotional drive to belong to an exclusive group or experience, deepening customer engagement.
FOMO works especially well on social media, where constant updates and visual comparisons make consumers acutely aware of what others have or are doing. Brands can utilize FOMO marketing to create a sense of belonging by positioning products or events as fleeting opportunities within a social context. However, brands must balance these tactics to avoid customer fatigue; when scarcity or exclusivity feels forced, consumers may feel manipulated, leading to buyer’s remorse and diminishing trust in the brand.
Using scarcity and FOMO together strategically—like in flash sales or early-bird events—can boost excitement and engagement. But to maintain brand integrity, it's essential to align FOMO with real value or exclusivity, ensuring customers feel genuinely rewarded for participating rather than pressured into impulsive decisions.
Scarcity and FOMO are powerful motivators that drive quick decision-making and create urgency.
Examples of Scarcity in Marketing
Effective Example
Supreme has built an entire brand identity around scarcity (Fowler, 2018). Their limited-edition product drops, which are released only a few times a year in highly restricted quantities, often sell out in minutes. This strategy has fostered a dedicated, almost cult-like community of fans who associate the brand with exclusivity and status. The demand is so high that a secondary resale market thrives, where items are sold at several times their original price. By offering only a few products each time, Supreme’s scarcity model creates a sense of urgency, which drives desire and reinforces brand loyalty, giving customers a feeling of being part of an exclusive club.
Another example of a short-term but effective use of the scarcity principle is in 2017 when Lush launched a limited-edition Orangutan Soap to raise awareness and funds for rainforest conservation (Sumatran Orangutan Society, 2017). Only a limited quantity was produced, with proceeds going toward efforts to protect the orangutans' natural habitats, which are threatened by deforestation and palm oil production. The scarcity of this product made it feel even more special to customers, encouraging purchases to support a meaningful cause while creating a sense of urgency. This campaign successfully combined exclusivity, social responsibility, and a compelling story, reinforcing Lush’s commitment to environmental issues.
Counterproductive Example
Amazon’s Prime Day was designed to create urgency with countless “limited-time offers,” yet the overwhelming volume of deals can sometimes backfire. With thousands of discounts spread across every category, Prime Day can feel more chaotic than exclusive (CXM, 2022). Customers often report feeling overwhelmed or even sceptical, as the sheer abundance of deals dilutes the sense of scarcity. This flood of offers can paradoxically lead shoppers to hesitate or wait, knowing that future deals are likely. The event demonstrates how scarcity can lose its effect if it’s perceived as overly abundant or artificially contrived.
Balanced Example
Disney’s Vault Strategy shows how a carefully calibrated scarcity approach can maintain long-term value. For years, Disney would re-release classic animated films like The Lion King or Beauty and the Beast for limited periods before placing them “in the vault” and making them unavailable for purchase (Doyle, 2008). This strategy heightened anticipation, as customers knew they had a limited time to buy. When a film was temporarily brought back, it saw renewed demand from nostalgic fans and new audiences alike. Disney’s approach effectively created long-term engagement and value by blending scarcity with selective re-accessibility.
Seasonal Scarcity Example
Starbucks’ Pumpkin Spice Latte (PSL) illustrates seasonal scarcity done right. The PSL is only available for a few months each year, yet it has achieved iconic status due to its limited-time availability (Skowron, 2023). Each fall, fans eagerly await its return, and many customers visit more frequently to enjoy it before it’s gone. By creating a “seasonal scarcity” model, Starbucks taps into a blend of tradition and exclusivity, keeping customers excited and boosting sales annually without exhausting demand.
Supreme, Disney’s Vault Strategy, and Starbucks’ Pumpkin Spice Latte demonstrate effective scarcity marketing.
Balancing Ethics and Effectiveness in Scarcity and FOMO Marketing
Scarcity and FOMO are most effective when they enhance a product's perceived value without putting undue pressure on the audience. When used sparingly and strategically, these tactics can create excitement and drive action. However, overusing them—or using them inauthentically—can lead to distrust, damage a brand's reputation, and alienate consumers. People who feel manipulated may disengage, leading to lost loyalty and increased costs to rebuild trust.
Best Practices for Using Scarcity and FOMO
Be Authentic: Use real scarcity, like limited stock, exclusive offers, or genuinely time-sensitive opportunities, to maintain credibility.
Communicate Clearly: Be transparent about the reasons for limitations, such as seasonal availability or small-batch production, to build trust with your audience.
Respect Consumer Decisions: Provide enough time for customers to make informed choices by offering pre-sales, previews, or early access.
Focus on Value: Highlight the unique benefits of your product or service beyond scarcity. Use testimonials, reviews, or user stories to show why it’s worth the investment.
Provide Alternatives: Offer options like waitlists, pre-orders, or reminders for future opportunities to retain interest even if someone misses out.
Diversify Your Approach: Avoid over-reliance on scarcity. Balance it with engaging, educational, or entertaining content to keep your messaging fresh and relevant.
When done right, scarcity and FOMO can create a sense of urgency and excitement that motivates action while maintaining trust. The key is to balance immediate results with fostering long-term customer loyalty, ensuring these strategies contribute to sustainable growth.
Conclusion: Using Scarcity and FOMO Thoughtfully
Scarcity and FOMO, when used responsibly, are powerful motivators that can enhance customer engagement and brand loyalty. These tactics work best in campaigns that emphasize value and create memorable experiences, making customers feel appreciated rather than pressured. A customer-centered approach—prioritizing authenticity, transparent communication, and consumer well-being—ensures that scarcity and FOMO tactics build, rather than erode, brand trust.
However, it's important to recognize that misuse or overuse of these strategies can backfire, leading to negative consumer backlash. Overwhelming consumers with high-pressure tactics can create skepticism, damage trust, and harm a brand's reputation in the long term. Brands must balance urgency with a sense of respect for their audience, carefully considering when and how to implement these techniques.
By fostering authenticity and reliability, brands can ensure these strategies support long-term loyalty and sustainable growth.
Need help rethinking your campaigns or building a long-lasting brand legacy? Our team is here to help you navigate the nuances of consumer psychology and craft strategies that truly resonate with your target audience.
References
Barton, B., Zlatevska, N., & Oppewal, H. (2022). Scarcity tactics in marketing: A meta-analysis of product scarcity effects on consumer purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing, 98(4), 741–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2022.04.003
Cialdini, R. B. (2006). Influence: The psychology of persuasion (Rev. ed.). New York: Harper Business. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/influencepsychol0000cial
CXM Editorial. (n.d.). Amazon Prime Day: The issue of choice overload. CXM.co.uk. Retrieved from https://cxm.co.uk/customer-experience/amazon-prime-day-the-issue-of-choice-overload/
Doyle, J. (2008). “Disney’s Movie Vault, 1984-1999,” PopHistoryDig.com. https://pophistorydig.com/topics/disneys-movie-vault-1984-1998/
Fowler, D. (2018, February 5). The hype machine: Streetwear and the business of scarcity. BBC Worklife. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20180205-the-hype-machine-streetwear-and-the-business-of-scarcity
Goldstein, E. B. (2014). Cognitive psychology: Connecting mind, research, and everyday experience (4th ed.). Cengage Learning.
McGinnis, R. (2004, March 24). Social theory at HBS: McGinnis’ two-factors. The Harbus. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20180620095648/http://www.harbus.org/2004/social-theory-at-hbs-2749/
Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., DeHaan, C. R., & Gladwell, V. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1841-1848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.014
Rousay, V. (2023). Bottom-up processing. Simply Psychology. Retrieved from https://www.simplypsychology.org/bottom-up-processing.html
Rousay, V. (2018). Top-down processing and perception. Simply Psychology. Retrieved from https://www.simplypsychology.org/top-down-processing.html
Skowron, C. (2023, September 13). The pumpkin spice phenomenon. Psychology Today. Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/a-different-kind-of-therapy/202309/the-pumpkin-spice-phenomenon
Solino, K. (2024, October 10). ZDNet. Prime Day: Here’s everything you need to know. ZDNet. Retrieved from https://www.zdnet.com/home-and-office/prime-day-heres-everything-you-need-to-know-2024-10-10/
Sumatran Orangutan Society. (n.d.). Saving Sumatra’s lush forests. Orangutan SOS. Retrieved from https://www.orangutans-sos.org/saving-sumatras-lush-forests/
